Standard camouflage pattern painting of equipment is not as effective inbuilt-up areas as a solid, dull, dark color hidden in shadows. An Infantryman's Guide to Combat in Built-up Areas (PDF). ![]() Patterns would include harsh and soft geometric patterns as well as soft, random curves utilized in the current Army field camouflage patterns. This project would develop various camouflage patterns for use in urban areas. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 26, 2021. Camouflage and Deception Techniques for Urban Warfare (PDF). The patterns showed promise but were never adopted. The US Army developed and evaluated two two-colour and one three-colour prototype patterns for a projected Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain (MOUT) camouflage uniform in 1994. The results provided by the TAS were used to assist in the development of candidate urban camouflage patterns. These domains provided data that demonstrated the range of colours in the scene through mean colour difference and CIELAB values. ![]() This was known as the "clustering" procedure, where pixels of the scene were grouped by colour into "domains". ![]() From these samples, the TAS gathered spectrophotometric data in order to determine the most prominent colours. In 1990, the US Army's Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center (now the Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center) analyzed individual samples of terrain ranging from rubble piles to stucco through the Terrain Analysis System (TAS). Techniques of developing urban camouflage have varied across time. During the Cold War, the British Army used vehicles painted in the "Berlin camouflage" urban pattern. Urban camouflage has rarely been used by armed forces in built up environments and mostly for limited trials. Further information: Operation Urban Warrior
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |